🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, typical households pays $27,000 each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. How medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what the typical US resident spends. I know dozens of clients that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, those payments also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting medical services. When including those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal military, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we take serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.